Genetically engineered crops part and parcel of decline of rural communities

The endless miles of dead brown fields are finally gone.
Spring in the Midwest should be announced by endless miles of green, but at best, a haphazard patchwork of winter wheat, rye, hayfields and the occasional bit of pasture are the only green that show up after snow-melt.
Most of the winter grains planted last fall have been sprayed and killed to make way for endless miles of corn and soybeans.
Corn, soy and alfalfa cover the Midwest, a monoculture of genetically engineered crops (GE) that have mostly displaced the small dairy farms and their pastures, the fields of small grain and diverse mixes of clover and grass hay.
We are at least partially through the herbicide season. The first wave was last fall’s “burn-down,” the nonselective spray application (most notably Roundup®) that kills everything and gives the fields that lovely dead brown look in the spring.
The spring “pre-emergence” spray (killing weeds before the corn and soy emerge) is over, the third wave of “post-emergence” spraying is in progress, and of course the forth and even fifth spray applications can come anytime during the summer to hopefully kill any weeds that escaped the first three attempts.
Then of course, wheat will need the pre-harvest application of, again, Roundup®, partly to kill any surviving perennials, but mostly to enhance the dry down of the grain. This is done a few days prior to harvest, and while it is quite effective as a desiccant, it also puts a good amount of herbicide directly on grain that will move into our food chain.
So, if nothing else, GE crops have clearly changed the appearance of our landscape, the crops farmers grow, and the way they manage weeds and pests. But they have changed the economy as well. The small diversified farms, the cheese factories and the small-town businesses are mostly gone.
Some would argue — mostly agricultural economists, corporate agribusiness executives and those farmers who decided to get big rather than get out — that modern agriculture is the economic engine that drives rural America.
And it does, but to those of us who still farm on a relatively small scale, who value the environment, try and keep our rural schools running, our rural roads passable our hospitals open, it appears modern agriculture has mostly driven the money out of rural America.
Industrialized agriculture still needs people to do the work, but that work must be done at very low wages. When the profit is gone, when small farms are gone, when farm inputs are no longer purchased locally, when the tax base erodes — rural communities die.

The profit seems to have, instead, gone into the pockets of seed, chemical and equipment companies, Wall Street banks and through the hands of corporate lobbyists into the hands of elected officials who will, at all costs, support corporate profit and the wishes of agribusiness. Small towns, people and the environment have become secondary to the growth of modern agriculture.
Just as blue-collar workers have seen their jobs and financial stability outsourced, so we have seen the wealth of our rural communities, the local farm income that had once been recirculated in our small towns, sent into the profit margins of corporate agribusiness.
So, do I blame this on genetically engineered crops? No, not directly, but the system of farming, the large-scale monoculture grain and livestock production for the world market could not exist without them.
Before the introduction of GE soy in 1996, the trend to larger and fewer farms was clearly happening, but the GE “promise” of effective weed control and higher yields certainly hastened that trend. But that “promise” was just that, a promise — one that was false and quickly broken.
The National Academy of Sciences, in a recent report, seemed to find no clear evidence supporting the grand promise of GE crops — they worked in some instances but failed in others. There was some indication of increased yield but weeds were developing herbicide resistance as well — in short, hardly a ringing endorsement. And GE crops actually increased herbicide usage — not a positive change for our health or the environment.
Despite the high cost and progressive failure of the GE technology, farmers continue (out of desperation to make a profit?) to embrace it and cover the Midwest with GE corn and soy. More grain is used to fatten livestock (despite the demand for grass-fed dairy and meat) and to further the growth of dairy, hog and poultry production into giant concentrated animal feeding operations, called CAFOs.
The integral part GE crops have played in the growth of industrial agriculture, the global food economy, obscene corporate profits and the decline of rural communities will be their real legacy and success — if you can call it that.
And don’t be surprised, as American consumers increasingly reject GE technology, corporate agribusiness and our government will force GE crops on the rest of the world. That, it seems, is one more aspect of American Exceptionalism.